Soviet Theory Of Knowledge

Rating :- 9.68 /10

Votes :- 11

But certainly one factor is the increasing development of contemporary means of publication and communication, which in turn make possible the rapid dissemination of ideas as well as an informed reaction to them.

Contemporary philosophy is by its nature pluralistic, to a perhaps greater extent than at any moment of the preceding tradition, in that there are multiple forms of thought competing for a position on the center of the philosophic stage. The reasons for this conceptual proliferation are numerous. And this in turn has increased the possibility for serious philosophic exchange by enhancing the available opportunities for the interaction of competing forms of thought.

In the relatively short period since Lukacs' death, there have been a number of books and many articles devoted to his work.

This is not the place to provide a general description either of Lukacs' life or of his work.! Descriptions of his life, especially his early career, are widely available. As this century nears an end, it has become increasingly clear that Georg Lukacs is one of the most ta.

1 The significance of the two papers by B.

.F. There (page 18) while the organization of "systematic studies on history of logic" is proposed as "one of the fundamental tasks for Marxist logicians", reference is made to a series of recent publications which suggest that such a task is already being accomplished. This article fills 45 pages.

Yet the consequences of Communism for philosophy and religion throughout the Soviet orbit are far from having the simplicity suggested by the stereotypes of a single, monolithic 'Marxism' and a consistent, crushing assault on the Church and on reÂ ligious faith.

Marxism and Religion in Eastern Europe.

Soviet Philosophy

There is currently no description available.

What beÂ comes of the criterion of truth when epistemology itself, like science, is

political economy.

Das Widerspruchsprinzip in der Neueren Sowjetischen Philosophie

There is currently no description available.

In a sense this book is comÂ plementary to his: he presents the doctrines of the classics and criticizes them, this book recounts what came after and what is going on now.

This means that some quesÂ tions of logic and psychology have been taken up - to the extent that they overlap with the field of philosophical consideration of knowledge. Since De Vries depended mainly on the 'classics of Marxism' and the few contemporary Soviet works which were available in German translation, his account is at best an inÂ troduction to the contemporary period. Even outside of this question of the legitimacy of epistemoÂ logy, it is not easy to delimit the domain of its purvey..

Das Widerspruchsprinzip in der Neueren Sowjetischen Philosophie

There is currently no description available.

In a sense this book is comÂ plementary to his: he presents the doctrines of the classics and criticizes them, this book recounts what came after and what is going on now.

No attempt to justify the existence of such a philosophical discipline will be attempted here. It is by no means meant to replace De Vries' excellent treatise on the same subject. Epistemology and theory of knowledge are taken here as equivalent terms, representing the Soviet gnose%gija and teorija poznanija. Since De Vries depended mainly on the 'classics of Marxism' and the few contemporary Soviet works which were available in German translation, his account is at best an inÂ troduction to the contemporary period.