On The Interpretation Of Treaties

For political reasons, states are decreasingly less willing to rely upon customary international law for the regulation of legal matters. 1 PURPOSE AND TOPIC We live in the age of treaties. In many fields of activity, we can seriously question whether the creation of a rule of custom is at all possible. At the same time, the increasing number of treaties should also be causing concern. By entering into written agreements, states avoid the difficulties inherent in customary international law. Increasingly, bilateral and multilateral written agreements are used for the creation of new international legal standards. Considering also that the number of states capable of drafting and concluding treaties seems to be growing, it is not surprising that treaties are concluded far more frequently than ever before. New technology and growing international exchange have established the need for an ever more precise and flexible international law – a need not satisfactorily met by customary law. The more treaties that are concluded, the more treaties that will have to be applied; and the more treaties that are applied, the more often the question will arise: To what extent, and under what specific conditions, should such an application occur? In several ways this is a development that should be met with approval. Naturally, this includes the question of how treaties should be interpreted.

Books > Law

On The Interpretation Of Treaties